Prof. Dr. Dr. Lydia Mechtenberg
Full Professor of Political Economy
Address
Office
Office hours
On appointment by email
Contact
Key aspects of activity
- Political Economy
- Behavioral Economics
- Experiments
- Game Theory
- Market Design
Short biography
Download full CV
- Since 2025: Spokesperson of DFG Research Unit 'Big Structural Change'"
- Since 2023: Full Professor of Political Economy at the Universität Hamburg (tenured)
- 2012-2022: Associate Professor of Economics at the Universität Hamburg (tenured)
- 2011 - 2012: Replacement Chair for Public Finance at the University of Mannheim, Department of Economics
- 2009 - 2011: Postdoctoral Researcher at the Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB), Department "Markets and Politics/Market Behavior"
- 2005 - 2009: Researcher/Postdoctoral Researcher at the Technical University of Berlin, Department of Microeconomics
- 2005: Fall and spring term, filling in for Professor Dr. Kuebler at the Technical University of Berlin, Department of Microeconomics
- 2003 - 2005: Researcher at the Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB), Department "Markets and Politics"
- 2001 - 2005: Researcher at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Department of Philosophy
- 2006: PhD in Economics, Technical University of Berlin (Degree: summa cum laude/ with distinction. Supervisors: Dorothea Kuebler, Paul Heidhues)
- 2004: PhD in Philosophy, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Degree: summa cum laude/ with distinction)
- 2002: Diplom (equivalent to Master) in Economics, Free University of Berlin (best degree of the cohort)
- 2000: Master in Philosophy, Free University of Berlin
Research interests
- Political Economy
- Behavioral Economics
- Experiments
- Game Theory
- Market Design
Selected Publications
Self-Signaling in Voting (with G. Perino, N. Treich, J.-R. Tyran, and S. Wang, forthcoming in the Journal of Public Economics).
Deliberative structures and their impact on voting behavior under social conflict (with J. Brandts and L. Gerhards, Experimental Economics 25, 680–705, 2022 [DOI: 10.1007/s10683-021-09729-4]).
Competition for Context-Sensitive Consumers (with A. Apffelstaedt, Management Science 67(5), 2828-2844, 2020 [DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3675]).
On the Failure of Hindsight-Biased Principals to Delegate Optimally (with D. Danz, D. Kübler and J. Schmid, Management Science 61(8), 1938-1958, 2015 [DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2087]).
Cheap Talk in the Classroom: How biased grading at school explains gender differences in achievements, career choices, and wages (Review of Economic Studies 76, 1431-1459, 2009 [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00551.x]).
Working Papers
When Do Proxy Advisors Improve Corporate Decisions? (with B. Büchel and A. F. Wagner).
Public Perception on Authority, Transparency, and Bias of AI in Courts: A Vignette Experiment with Chat Intervention (with H. Hüning and A. Wömmel).
Using Arguments to Persuade: Experimental Evidence (with H. Hüning and S. Wang).
Detecting Argumentative Discourse in Online Chat Experiments (with H. Hüning and S. Wang).
How to Talk about an Out-Group: Effects on In-Group Trust and Out-Group Generosity (with J. Biermann and H. Hüning).
Fairness in Matching Markets: Experimental evidence (with T. Koenig, D. Kuebler, and R. Schmacker).
The Paradox of Integration: A model of relative group standings.
Projects
The researchers of the HAS CSS Institute for Legal Studies also contributed to the application for the research funding, which has been awarded a one billion HUF grant by the European Union under Horizon 2020 (Principal Investigator: Prof. Dr. Dr. Lydia Mechtenberg, Department of Economics). The DEMOS (Democratic Efficacy and the Varieties of Populism in Europe) research project, led by HAS Centre for Social Sciences has received one billion HUF funding from the European Union. The joint research project is based on a cooperation among 15 European partners, including such distinguished research institutes as the Universities of Hamburg and Copenhagen. Under the strict requirements of the EU Research and Innovation programmes only the most outstanding applications are found eligible for funding. During the evaluation process such criteria are considered by a board composed of European scholars as professional excellence, social impact, and the expected quality of realisation.